法官又指，即使合約方有披露責任，刑責歸於公司，非歸於其人員。最後，上訴庭認為控方未能證明二人曾干犯欺詐，裁定上訴得直。
更多精彩内容，关注钛媒体微信号（ID：taimeiti），或者下载钛媒体App
。关于这个话题，下载安装 谷歌浏览器 开启极速安全的 上网之旅。提供了深入分析
The reason is always the same: the content and the key that decrypts it are both present on the client’s machine. The user’s hardware decrypts the content to display it. The user’s hardware is, definitionally, something the user controls. Any sufficiently motivated person with the right tools can intercept the decrypted output.
I'm available for hire.